CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) RESOURCE CENTER Read More

CA SB 588

Title: Property taxation: welfare exemption: lower income households: cap.
Author: Benjamin J. Allen

Summary
SB 588, as amended, Allen. Property taxation: welfare exemption: lower income households: cap. The California Constitution authorizes the Legislature to exempt from taxation, in whole or in part, property that is used exclusively for religious, hospital, or charitable purposes, and is owned or held in trust by a nonprofit entity. Pursuant to this constitutional authority, existing law partially exempts, as described, from property taxation property that is used exclusively for rental housing and related facilities and that is owned and operated by specified entities if any of specified criteria are met. Under existing law, one of those criteria requires, except in the case of a limited partnership in which the managing general partner is a nonprofit corporation eligible for the exemption, that 90% or more of the occupants of the property be lower income households whose rents do not exceed the rent limits prescribed by a specified law. Existing law limits the total exemption amount allowed to a taxpayer under that criteria, with respect to a single property or multiple properties for any fiscal year on the sole basis of the application of that criterion, to $20,000,000 of assessed value.This bill would remove, for the 2024–25 fiscal year through the 2028–29 fiscal year, the above-described limit on the total exemption amount for any property for which a claim is filed and granted if, in addition to the above-described requirement, at least 90% of the property’s units are made continuously available to, as defined, or are occupied by lower income households, as defined, at a rent that does not exceed the rent for lower income households, as prescribed by specified law, the property is owned and operated by an eligible nonprofit corporation, and the claimant provides an affidavit, signed under penalty of perjury, that any additional moneys that would have been used to pay any ad valorem property taxes on the property if not for the removal of the exemption cap will be used for the construction or rehabilitation of single or multifamily residential units on specified properties. The bill would require the claimant seeking an exemption pursuant to the bill’s provisions to provide to the county assessor any additional documents and materials requested by the county assessor necessary to evaluate the claimant’s eligibility for the exemption. The bill would also provide that the claimant is liable for property tax for the years for which the property received the bill’s tax benefit if single or multifamily residential units were not constructed or rehabilitated or were not in the course of construction or rehabilitation by specified dates, as specified. By expanding the crime of perjury and imposing additional duties on local tax officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to contain, among other things, specific goals, purposes, and objectives that the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements.This bill would include findings and reporting requirements in compliance with this requirement.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.Existing law requires the state to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation.This bill would pr

Status
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.

Bill Documents
CA SB 588 - 06/30/23 - Amended Assembly
06/30/23 - CA SB 588 (06/30/23 - Amended Assembly)


CA SB 588 - 03/20/23 - Amended Senate
03/20/23 - CA SB 588 (03/20/23 - Amended Senate)

CA SB 588 - 02/15/23 - Introduced
02/15/23 - CA SB 588 (02/15/23 - Introduced)

Add To Favorites

Author Details


  • Ben Allen - D
    Senator - State Senate - CA

    Contact this Senator
    Visit their Website

    Contact Tips

    Capital Address:
    1021 O Street, Suite 6610
    Sacramento, CA 95814-4900
    9166514024

    District Address:
    111 Penn Street, Suite 101
    El Segundo, CA 90278 3279
    Phone: 3104148190